Tuesday, December 15, 2015

FIRE IN THE DREAMS....


ODD AND EVEN - PART-II
 
In our previous blogs on the Grp-A Recruitment Rules issue, we have received a large number of queries and the exact observation of CAT-Mumbai in the Petition No. 668/2015, are as under :-

Para 7. There shall be an interim order to the extent that the amended Rules being the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) Group-A Rules, 2012 shall not be notified till the next date of hearing.

During the hearing the Counsel for the Union of India submitted a written reply and argued that the 2118 posts is on adhoc basis for a period of 5 years, i.e. upto 17-Dec-2018. Board has placed Draft Revised Rules on the website on 08-Dec-2014, wherein it contains provisions for filling up the posts in the two newly created grades in HAG+ and the Apex grade. Provisions in respect of 2118 temporary posts were also included in the said draft Rules.

Thereafter, the draft was submitted to the UPSC on 30-July-2015. On 23-Sept-2015, the UPSC approved the draft proposal without the proposal for inclusion of the provisions in respect of the 2118 temporary posts in the grade of Assistant Commissioners, as approved by the Cabinet. Thereafter on 24-Nov-2015 it was sent to the Legislative Department for vetting the RR, which was approved by them on 07-Dec-2015. As the 2118 posts were adhoc & on temporary basis, the applicant do not have any cause of action and clearly based on their assumption and presumption and pleaded that the petition be dismissed.

However, after hearing both the sides, the Honourable CAT, Mumbai has sarcastically commented that the Board is aware, UPSC is not bigger than Cabinet and passed an interim order dated 14-Dec-2015 as mentioned above - Para 7.

Next date of hearing is 06-Jan-2016.

It was not expected from any corner that the whistle will be blown and that the match will be over with a self-inflicted goal. Board is concerned only for the posts which has been created for their benefit and least concerned about the stagnation of Supdt. Central Excise Cadre and to devise any mechanism to remove the parity among the stakeholders, exclusively all for themselves.
 
CESA, Mumbai, will be sharing another good news tomorrow...
 
**********

Monday, December 14, 2015

ODDS AND EVENS...


Petition on Grp-A Recruitment Rules :-
As informed earlier, the Promotee Officers of Grp-A, Mumbai & Pune, have filed a petition in Mumbai CAT, challenging the proposed new Grp-A Recruitment Rules(RRs), wherein no mention is made about 2118 temporary posts created in the Cadre Restructuring-2014, and prayed for a stay in its publication till the requisite amendments are carried out.

The Promotee Officers Association filed a Misc. Petition against the Recruitment Rules to advance (prepone) the hearing from 21-Dec-2015 to the 18-Dec-2015. The matter came up for hearing today.

On hearing both the sides, the Honourable CAT-Mumbai stayed the issuance of Notification for Recruitment Rules till the next date of hearing, i.e. 06-Jan-2016.

It is a shock to the Board, who did not expect the RR for Grp-A to be stayed at a local level like CAT-Mumbai. This will block the Board from holding the DPC for carrying out any promotion of the senior officers. The frustration of not getting promoted/delay in promotions will now be felt by the senior officers.

It is learnt that due to the delay in the completion of the formality for the issuance of the RR Notification, the senior officers of the Department met the UPSC Chairman/Member and also the Secretary, DoPT, requesting them to hold the DPC for the posts arising out of Cadre Restructuring at the earliest. Both the USPC Chairman & the Secretary, DoPT, have categorically informed that without regularization of the earlier adhoc posts, no more dates for DPC will be granted.

The CAT-Mumbai stay order will further increase the frustration levels of the senior officers, who are helpless except for gnawing on their nails.

***********

Friday, December 11, 2015

TIME WARRANTS ACTION...



If you don’t want to do something, you will find one hundred excuses for not doing the same,
But if you want to do something, you will find a way to do it in spite of your busy schedule.
    Time is running away and all our issues are still pending.
     Remaining in Delhi but not entering into North Block nor having any dialogue with Chairman and Member(P&V), when all our issues are festering.
      Now 7th Pay Commission has already submitted its report and swept all our suggestions/demands under the carpet. Chairman is likely to call all the Associations for their submissions on the 7th Pay commission recommendations. Similarly, an independent Implementation Committee has already been formed to look into the 7th Pay Commission recommendentations and to suggest ways and means for implementations of the same. We cannot sit idle and leave it to the administrations’ mercy. As far as the MACP is concerned, our submissions were not accepted and placed Central Excise officers at a dis-advantage.
    Non-holding of DPC and not granting further promotions from Grp-B to Grp-A is dis-heartening. Since last promotions i.e. Oct-2014 to Nov-2015, 342 Superintendents have retired without being promoted as Grp-A (+21 Supdt will retire in Dec-2015) for no fault of theirs.
 
Lines from Superstar Amitabh Bachan :-
     Lingering in the matter of granting reservations on promotion and Board’s inability to take a clear decision as done by CBDT and keeping the post vacant. The validity of these temporary posts is fixed for 5 years and each passing day, who will compensate ?
      As reported in the Times of India, Chennai Edition, about the Chennai flood and the massive devastation caused, not by nature but by the lethargic bereaucrat who was waiting for a decision to open the sluice gates.
 
     If timely action is not taken the Grp-B cadre will lead towards devastation not by others but by us only.

***********

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

QUESTION REMAINS.... ANSWER VARIES...




Board vide its letter dated 04-Nov-2015, communicated to all the Cadre Controlling Authorities to transfer all the petitions filed in the respective Zonal CAT to Principal CAT, New Delhi. Accordingly, transferring of all the petitions are in progress. 
Meanwhile, CBEC vide its letter dated 04-Dec-2015 sought for a reply to the Lok Sabha Parliamentary Question No. 4963, whether instructions contained in OM No. 36012/45/2005-Estt(Res) dated 10-Aug-2010 were implemented in CBEC & CBDT.  
In CBEC, it is learnt that all the Cadre Controlling Authorities have replied in the positive about its implementation.
As regards to the OM No. 36012/45/2005-Estt(Res) dated 10-Aug-2010, the Punjab & Haryana High Court vide its order CWP No. 13218 of 2009 (O&M) dated 15-July-2011 in the case of Lachhmi Narain Gupta And Others vs Jarnail Singh And Others has squashed the said OM.

The operative part of the order is reproduced below :-
“40. …….. Likewise, the instructions dated 10.8.2010 (P-16) are hereby quashed because they are in direct conflict with the view taken by the Constitution Bench in M. Nagaraj's Nagaraj's case (supra) and Suraj Bhan Meena's case (supra).” 

This fact has also been acknowledged by the Board in Para 3 of their letter dated 15-Feb-2012 issued under F.No. C-18012/23/2010-ADIIIB, which is reproduced below :-
“3. The present status as informed by the DoPT is that the provisions of their O.M. No. 36012/45/2005-Estt(Res) dated 10.08.2010 have been quashed by the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the matter of Lacchmi Narain Gupta Vs Jarnail Singh. ……”

As regards to reservations in promotions, the Board has filed an affidavit in the CAT stating that they will act as per the “rule of the land”, and is in consultation with the Law Ministry to ascertain what is the “rule of the land”.
Even after getting a clear cut reply from the Law Ministry about the “rule of the land”, CBEC  is still on silent mode. Further, in this regard, the Hon’ble FM’s reply to a Rajya Sabha question is annexed.

It is learnt that in CBDT, the said OM is not implemented.
It is surprising to learn that the Govt. of India spends a lot of money on training its officers by sending them abroad. But it is unfortunate to watch them when they are unable to take/give a coherent decision in the matter. The matter is lingering on in CBEC due to in-decisiveness.
We hope that good sense will prevail and post lying vacant will be filled up at the earliest.

**************

Monday, December 7, 2015

INDISPENSABLE....WHAT ABOUT THE REST ?




Ref: CESA/67/2015
                                                                                                            Date: 07-Dec-2015.


Shri. S. C. Varshney,
Principal Chief Commissioner
Central Excise Zone-I &
Cadre Controlling Authority,
Mumbai Zone.

  

Sub:- Request for incorporating guidelines in Transfer & Posting Policy for Grp-B in the matter of deputation/loan Posting and repatriation on completion of tenure – reg.


Respected Sir,

             Your kind attention is invited to the “Transfer & Posting Policy” of Grp-B of Mumbai Zone.

             This association had earlier represented to various Chief Commissioners to prescribe a policy for sending Group-B officers on Deputation/loan basis to various organizations and Directorates. However, on one pretext or the other, no such policy has been formulated so far.

In the present Transfer & Posting Policy for Group-B officers issued in the year 2014-15, Para 10.1 states that :-

“Cadre clearances for deputation to offices under the CBEC/outside organization shall be through Cadre Controlling authority. Request for extension in tenure (1 year) on deputation will be decided by the Chief Commissioner of the Zone.”


This policy statement is silent on the process of selection & posting of officers and their extension in that organization.

It is seen that officers are continuing for years together, even after promotion to the next cadre, beyond their prescribed tenure of deputation/loan.

The very objective of the Transfer and Posting Policy is defeated as well as in violation of CVC guidelines/norms. Because of this wrong practice there is lot of resentment in the Grp-B cadre, as many of the officers do not get an opportunity to work in other organizations in their lifetime.

It will not be out of place to mention here that these postings are considered sensitive and hence such prolonged tenure in such Directorate etc. is not in conformity of CVC norms without any cooling-off period, yet no attention is paid by the authorities.   

It was expected that the said practice will not be continued after the Cadre Restructuring-2014, as the number of officers to be sent on deputation to other formations was allocated against the strength of every Cadre Control. However, the conventional manner of adhoc posting is still going on. It is on record that in formations like DRI, DGCEI, Settlement Commission, DG(Inspection), DG(Audit), DG(ST), etc., many officers have put in more years than the prescribed maximum of 7 years (i.e. Deputation period of 5 years + 2 years extension). Same set of officers are rotated continuously either as on deputation or on loan basis, which is highly objectionable and not in the interest of the organization, but rather leans towards the needs of the Senior Officers.

In this regard, your kind attention is drawn to Para 10.3 of the OM dated 02-July-2015, issued by the DoPT, New Delhi and circulated by the Board vide Circular No. 20/2015 dated 31-July-2015, wherein it is clearly stated that :-

“ …there should be periodic rotation of officers and no officer should be allowed to be posted …. for more than the prescribed tenure…”.

These instructions should be implemented rather than remaining as mere instructions for record purposes.

Further, as per the Grp-A Transfer & Posting policy, rotation of the senior officers takes place without any deviation but the same is not the case of junior officers, who are allowed to continue as if they are indispensible.  It appears that the confidence of the Senior Officers have declined, unlike earlier times, that they cannot perform in the organisation without these junior officers. Sometimes officers are posted on recommendations just for sake of obligation or to remain in good books of some senior officers, at the cost of compromising the efficiency as well as integrity of the organization, ignoring all the norms of Establishment like cooling period, going from one deputation to another, or from one loan-basis to another just to avoid non-sensitive postings.


CESA, Mumbai, once again suggests the following :-

1)  that the staff & officer requirements of the Executive & Audit commissionerates of Central Excise and Service Tax, be first met before considering the requirements of other organizations/Directorates.

2)  The officers already posted in the DRI, DGCEI, Settlement Commission, DGST, DG(Audti) DG(Valuation), NACEN, etc., who have completed their stipulated tenure should be immediately repatriated without any delay or excuses.

3)  Those officers who have completed more than 1 year on loan-basis should also be repatriated back to their parent Commissionerate.

4)  There should be maximum deputation tenure in entire career of every cadre as in the case of Group ‘A’ it is 10 years only. We suggest that the same be applied and not more than 5 years at a stretch.

5)  To curb the manipulations, the tenure (incl. Deputation and on loan-basis) should not exceed 12 years in total in their entire career.

6)  Also, the cooling-off period has to be strictly adhered as per the CVC guidelines. Without completing cooling-off period of 2 years, no officer should be allowed to go on further deputation / loan-basis.

7)  Keeping officers in these organizations, who have already reached the ceiling of the maximum reward, thus depriving other officers a chance to work in these organizations (Reference to Para 10.3 of the New Reward Policy guidelines issued vide Circular No. 20/2015 date 31-July-2015)

8)  As it has happened in the recent M&P Establishment Order dtd. 04-Dec-2015, advance copy of applications are entertained which is in violation of norms specified by the Cadre Controlling authority itself !!

The representations received through proper channel only should be considered for the sake of transparency.


Further, while considering officers for deputation/loan-basis, back-door entry should be curbed and should only be on the basis of a roster of willing officers and posting to these organization should be done only once in a year. Care may be taken to ensure utmost transparency so that the officers of Grp-B cadre will not feel deceived.

         Being a cadre controlling authority the data of each officer is already available on records. Kindly look into the same and suitable action may be initiated in this regard for smooth administration.

 CESA, Mumbai, assures to extend all assistance and co-operation in this regard, if required, even at short notice.
              Thanking you,

Yours sincerely,


A.  K. SASMAL
                                                                      General Secretary

Friday, December 4, 2015

TREMOR IN THE CBEC...



     The CBEC Board was unaware that a set of officers alongwith newly formed Grp-A Promotee IRS Officers had filed a petition in Mumbai CAT challenging the impropriety of the new Grp-A Recruitment Rules (RRs) and seeking a stay on publishing it in the Gazette, which is mandatory before its implementation.

     Board was ready to hold DPC as per the new RRs to fill all the vacant posts of Chief Commissioner and Pr. Chief Commissioners. The present move will definitely restrain them from proceeding further in this regard.

     Now the Board will think whether to include the 2118 temporary posts and extending adhocism as continuing in all the cadres for more than one year by deviating from established DOPT guidelines.

      It came as a shock to Grp-A officers when they came to know about the petition filed in Mumbai-CAT which challenged their supremacy in Grp-A cadre matters. The next date of hearing 21-Dec-2015.

*************

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

FROM CESA-MUMBAI'S DESK...



Update from Mumbai CAT :- In the case filed by the DEOs (Waghmare & others) with regards to the sanctioned strength of Inspectors & Superintendents, as the stay is continued, for which further promotions from Inspectors to Superintendents of Mumbai zone is not carried out.
The next date of hearing is 07-Jan-2016, and likely to be finalized thereafter.

Implementation of SC Parmar judgement in Central Excise, Cadre Controlling Mumbai Zone :- 


CESA, Mumbai, filed two petitions in Mumbai CAT, one is seeking implementation of the Parmar decision from 1986 and the other is seeking implementation from 1981.  Accordingly the seniority of the eligible officers would be changed as per the year of vacancy mentioned in the Advt. and not as per the year of joining.

Apart from CESA-Mumbai, around 15 officers have also filed similar petition and sought the benefit of Parmar judgment from 1986.

The above petitions are already admitted & circulated and the Department has also filed the reply. The applicants’ advocate is likely to file the counter-reply. Once, both the petitions are disposed off, the entire scenario of the seniority list, both at zonal & All-India level, will be changed.

As you are aware, the Board has issued instructions to implement the Parmar Judgement from the date of the SC Judgement, i.e.  27-Nov-2012. The demand for granting retrospective seniority is still pending with the Ministry.
Next date of hearing is 18-Jan-2016.

Petition on Review DPC :-  
89 Promotee officers of Grp-A have filed a petition in Mumbai CAT against reversion by holding Review DPC and were able to obtain a stay.

Similar petitions were filed by officers from other cities in the zonal CATs.

Few officers of Mumbai have intervened to oppose and prayed to vacate the stay.

Mumbai CAT, on the basis of affidavit filed by the Department, and after considering the affidavit filed by the intervening officers, disposed off their prayer of vacation and continued operation of stay till next date i.e. 17-Dec-2015.

Meanwhile, the CBEC has instructed all the Cadre Controlling Zones to transfer all the similar petitions filed across CATS in all Zones to the Principal CAT, New Delhi. Accordingly, Mumbai Zone has also filed the Request Petition to transfer the case from Mumbai to New Delhi. It is learnt that around 13 zones (out of 16) have already filed similar request Petitions to transfer the case to Principal CAT, New Delhi.

Petition on Grp-A Recruitment Rules :- Promotee Officers of Grp-A, Mumbai & Pune, have filed a petition in Mumbai CAT, challenging the proposed new Grp-A Recruitment Rules(RRs), wherein no mention is made about 2118 temporary posts created in the Cadre Restructuring-2014, and prayed for a stay in its publication till the requisite amendments are carried out. The said petition is admitted and circulated and the next date of hearing is on 04-Dec-2015.

3rd MACP :- The issue of 3rd MACP as per the Chennai High Court’s order and grant of the same by Shillong & Jaipur Cadre Controlling Zone is represented by CESA-Mumbai with the Board as well as with the local administration.  Efforts are being made with the Dy. Pr. PAO, West Zone, to sort out the matter. Pr. PAO is expected in Mumbai next week and hope that uniformity in this regard will prevail.

Holding of DPC from Grp-B to Grp-A :-  Dossiers are being collected, however, due to the intervention of the “Parliamentary Committee on SC/ST”, a meeting of all the Secretaries in the Government is likely to be held in this week, so that a uniform decision on the issue of reservation in promotion can be taken.  

Pune posting/ repatriation :-  Officers, who were posted to Pune / Nashik / Aurangabad on promotion  will be completing one year (by Dec-2015) will be repatriated to their respective Zone, and in their place officers in the Pune roster will be sent. The order is likely to be issued by Friday, 04-Dec-2015.  
***********