I feel now every housewife should help the finance minister prepare the
budget
==
No, that is not what my job is. I know
finance ministers are never praised. Even for rights they are criticized and
for wrongs lambasted. In reality, I feel that most finance ministers don’t
understand the bureaucratic statistical jugglery. I too.
I feel now every housewife should help
the finance minister prepare the budget. I have heard that wives of many
finance ministers, including of Manmohan Singh, were unhappy with the budgets
presented by their husbands.
I told my wife Anju, to help me in that
process. She said: “Please stop doing that. Except bringing lots of raddi,
Budget has not ever helped me”. That’s brusque for an onerous job that fills
half the newspaper and television news time through the year. Are they all
producing raddis? The Budget has no sanctity. My better half says, “It has only
one sanctity. After each Budget, problems go up, processes become complicated
and prices of commodities rise. After a Budget I buy less than what I bought
for the last one year”.
Should the government then stop making
the budget, I ask. She says, “No. Its ingredients remain the same. Why don’t
you standardize to bring out the budgetary statement in an automatic fashion.”
How is it possible?
She brings some old budget papers
without the cover and asks, “Tell me which year’s Budget these are?” I can’t
make out. Figures look so similar. The style has not changed and every Budget
claims better days – ache din ayenge. My wife knows better than me that she was
happier when salary and income was far less than what I, my son or daughter has
today. I agree.
But she throws up a challenge. “You
claim to know so much about the budget. You have been the worst critics of
finance ministers. Why don’t you prepare one for me? At least prove me wrong”.
She even threatened like the tax man: “If you don’t, I will stop preparing food
for the family”.
Having suffered under the hands of
fnance ministers, and having starved often, I didn’t want the children to
suffer. With a glum face, that is how I have seen most finance ministers, I sit
down to prepare the onerous national duty.
I write: I shall abolish income-tax:
She asked me why? I told her at least I can buy my lunch, which I often forgo.
It would also save me from taking loans at high interest to pay for my
granddaughter’s primary education. She was furious. “Do you want the government
to starve”, she asked like a capitalist-communist. I feebly explain: “The
government wouldn’t be a bit poorer. Of course, many tax officers would lose a
lot–their jam and butter. The government could do well to sack at least
two-thirds of them and save over Rs 2 lakh crore – more than Rs 1.75lakh crore
that I-T brings. It would also save lakhs of people harassment, despite having
paid what they could”. She agrees, but adds: “Why should the I-T officer and
his gang agree. You don’t know the dynamics of dealings”. I said, “You are
right, but Prime Minister wants a clean India and I want to help him”.
Abolish tax deducted at source on bank
deposit: Anju said, “That is sensible. I have lost much. But I can somehow bear
it. But do you know my maid complained she lost sums for keeping her money in
the bank. I have advised her not to do it again”. This was my turn to be
furious: “You have done great disservice to the nation. If people won’t put
money in banks where would the government get money to borrow and run the
administration? Most government servants would not get their salary either”.
Cursing me she said, “Government should be honest and shouldn’t loot poor man’s
money”. She was making sense.
End Education cess: I tell her, the
government is charging cess too for education. But do you know the education
shops have been sold to private looters, sorry educators. They are bleeding us.
Why should I pay this cess? She said, “You are right. My father used to say
that schooling was so affordable and quality was good. If the Government can’t
do its duty, why should it levy any charge?”
Make agriculture fundamental of
economy: Anju disagreed. “You would remain in the medieval ages. I know how
zamindars in my village used to look down upon the kisans. They are rustics,
don’t understand. If their land is used for industry so many jobs can be
created and they could live like babus”. This was a bit too much for someone,
who was steeped in Gandhism, as is our Prime Minister. I replied: “If kisan
wouldn’t till the land, where would you get your basmati rice, MP Sona wheat,
the delicious fruits and vegetables, which you love the most. Do you know over
75crore people of the 125crore population still subsist on farming? No industry
can give kisans jobs. If the kisan doesn’t do farming, no industry would give a
job to turn him into a babu. He would come to the city with a begging bowl.
Would you like that?” She says, “You are right”.
(Courtesy : Orissa Post of February 25, 2015)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.