Tuesday, July 12, 2016

MODIFIED TRANSFER & POSTING POLICY...

 

                                                                        F.No. II/3-7/Admn/CCO/MCX-I/2015/2169
                                                                        Mumbai, the 11th July, 2016.
To,
The Principal Commissioner / Commissioner,
Central Excise,
Mumbai-I/II/III/IV/Thane-I/II/Raigad/Belapur/
Appeals-I/II/CX-Audit-I/II/LTU/LTU-Audit, Mumbai.

The Principal Commissioner / Commissioner,
Service Tax-I/II/III/IV/V/VI/VII/
Appeals-I/II/Audit-I/II/III, Mumbai.

The Principal Commissioner / Commissioner,
Central Excise,
Pune-I/II/III/IV/Goa/Kolhapur/
Audit-I/II/Appeals-I/II-Pune/S.Tax, Pune/ Audit (ST) Pune/Appeal-ST, Pune
Nashik-I/II/Aurangabad/Wardha/Audit-II, Nagpur.
 

Madam/Sir, 

Sub:- Modified Transfer/Placement Policy Guidelines, 2016  for
         Group ‘B’ Gazetted and Non-Gazetted Executive Officers in
         the Mumbai Central Excise Cadre – reg. 

The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Zone-I & Zone-II and the Chief Commissioner, Service Tax Zone, Mumbai have approved amendment to the  ModifiedTransfer/Placement Policy Guidelines, 2015  for  Group ‘B’ Gazetted and Non-GazettedExecutive Officers in the Mumbai Central Excise Cadre resulting in the revised Transfer/Placement Policy.  The same shall be  named as Transfer/Placement Policy Guidelines, 2016  for Group ‘B’ Gazetted and Non-Gazetted Executive Officers in the Mumbai Central Excise Cadre. 

2.         A copy of the same is enclosed herewith for record and guidance.  The said policy guidelines have also been uploaded in the Central Excise Mumbai-I’s official website www.mumbaicentralexcisecbec.gov.in

3.         The Chief Commissioner, Central Excise, Mumbai Zone-I desires that the guidelines prescribed therein shall be implemented strictly and expeditiously.

4.         Difficulties faced, if any, in the implementation of the said policy may please be brought to the notice of this office.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-11.07.2016
(DILIP GOYAL)
                                                                      ADDL. COMMISSIONER (CCO) 




Transfer/Placement Policy Guidelines, 2016
 for Group ‘B’ Gazetted and Non-Gazetted Executive Officers
in the Mumbai Central Excise Cadre.
 
1.     APPLICABILITY 

1.1  The Mumbai Central Excise Cadre Control covers the geographical area and posts under the jurisdiction of the Central Excise Zones-I and II, Mumbai (including Large Taxpayer Unit (LTU)/ LTU Audit), Service Tax Zone, Mumbai, Pune Zone, Central Excise Commissionerates of Nasik and Aurangabad, Nagpur Zone, and the Audit-II Commissionerate of Nagpur Zone.  

         1.2  The guidelines contained in this policy shall apply, in toto, to the officers posted in all the Commissionerates of Central Excise Mumbai Zone-I (including Large Taxpayer Unit (LTU)/ LTU Audit), Mumbai Zone - II and Service Tax Zone, Mumbai.  It also applies to officers of the above said cadre and posted in all the Commissionerates of Pune Zone, the Central Excise Commissionerates of Aurangabad and Nasik in Nagpur Zone, and Audit-II Commissionerate of Nagpur Zone, in so far as it relates to them as explained herein. 

        1.3  This policy also applies to the officers posted to Directorate General of Service Tax Mumbai, DGTS Mumbai, Appeals (Central Excise and Service Tax) and Marine & Preventive Wing of Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate, Mumbai. 

        1.4    This policy also seeks to manage/facilitate placement of officers of the cadre controlling zone on deputation/transfer on loan basis to various other Directorates and formations of CBEC such as DRI, DGCEI, DG Valuation, DG Audit, NACEN etc. in Mumbai. 

        1.5    The instructions contained in this policy will supersede all the guidelines issued in the past, in so far as it relates to transfer and posting of officers in the cadre of Group ‘B’ Gazetted and Non-Gazetted Executive Officers. 

        1.6   This policy will be subject to the instructions/guidelines issued/to be issued from time to time by the CBEC and the Department of Personnel, Government of. India.
 

          2.      AIMS OF THE POLICY  

         2.1   The aim of this transfer and posting policy is to lay down standard norms with a view to provide objectivity and transparency in posting and transfers of officers and to improve efficiency of  administration. 

        2.2   The policy also seeks to ensure that subject to administrative exigencies the guidelines issued by the Government with reference to the special requirements of women officers and also to ensure that compassionate cases are treated deservingly.
 

        3.      GENERAL GUIDELINES 

       3.1 The Cadre Controlling Authority in respect of Group 'B' Gazetted and Non-
Gazetted Executive Officers in the Mumbai Central Excise Cadre is the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Zone-I.
 

        3.2    All transfers and postings of officers from one Zone to another Zone within the Mumbai Central Excise Cadre Control, and to LTU/LTU (Audit) shall be effected only with the approval of the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Zone-I. 

         3.3  The annual Inter-Zonal Transfer (IZT) shall be done by the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Zone-I. The IZT should normally be completed by the 30th of April every year. For calculating tenure of an officer in a Zone/Comm’te, the tenure shall be computed on ‘Order-to-Order’ basis rather than a particular month/date of a year with a grace period of 2 months. 

         3.4   Transfers and Posting of officers to the Commissionerates within each Zone of Mumbai Central Excise Cadre Control shall be done by the  Chief Commissioner of the respective Zone. The annual Inter Commissionerate Transfer (ICT) should normally be completed by the 30th of May every year. 

         3.5    For the sole purpose of this policy, the geographical area under the jurisdiction of Mumbai CX Zones-I and II, and Service Tax Zone, Mumbai, shall be treated as a single station, i.e., Mumbai.  

        3.6  Subject to administrative exigencies and with the exception of cases on compassionate grounds, officers on promotion shall, ordinarily be transferred out of the Commissionerates in which they are working at the time of promotion. 

        3.7     The Establishment Branch of the Cadre Controlling Cell in the office of the Chief Commissioner, Central Excise Zone-I, Mumbai shall ensure that the database containing the profiles/history of posting of all officers is maintained and regularly updated. 

        3.8   Whenever vacancies exist in a particular cadre under Mumbai Central Excise Cadre Control, these vacancies will be apportioned to each Zone/Commissionerate and other offices of CBEC as well as M&P and LTU within the Cadre Control on a pro-rata basis, and postings of officers to each Zone/Commissionerate and other offices will be made accordingly.
 

4.         GUIDELINES ON INTER ZONAL TRANSFER WITHIN MUMBAI                   

        4.1  The provisions of this clause shall apply to the officers working in Mumbai Central Excise, Zones-I and II, and Service Tax Zone, Mumbai. 

        4.2  The tenure of an officer in a Central Excise/Service Tax Zone will be for a period of 5 years. 
 
4.3       An officer who has completed his tenure in a Central Excise Zone will be transferred to the Service Tax Zone and vice-versa, and on completion should be rotated as shown below :-
A->B->C  or   C->B->A
where B stands for Mumbai Service Tax Zone and
A & C stands for Central Excise Zone-I & II respectively. 
Exceptions to the above may be considered by the Administration as per exigencies.

 

        5.     GUIDELINES FOR INTER-COMMISSIONERATE TRANSFER WITHIN MUMBAI CX ZONES I & II, SERVICE TAX ZONE  

        5.1    Inter-Commissionerate Transfer (ICT) of officers should be effected annually in Mumbai Central Excise Zones-I and II, and Service Tax Zone by the respective Chief Commissioners of the Zones. In the ICT, an officer can be transferred to any Commissionerate within that Zone. 

5.2       In view of the Department moving towards an Audit based control, the normal tenure of an officer posted to any Audit Commissionerate (Central Excise Audit or Service Tax Audit) shall be three years and the posting in LTU-Audit will be two years, subject to administrative exigencies. 

         5.3 :

a)    The normal tenure of an officer in a Commissionerate shall be three years. In HQ / Divisions / Ranges – each posting shall be for a period of one year, except in the case of officers posted to Anti-Evasion/Preventive, where the tenure shall be of maximum two years. However, exception may be considered by the Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner as per requirement.
b)    In respect of Service Tax Executive Commissionerates, the postings in  Range/Group and Anti Evasion section, the maximum tenure of the officer shall be two years.  However, based on the administrative requirement, the officer in Anti Evasion section may continue for more than two years, maximum upto three years with prior approval of the Chief Commissioner. In respect of all other sections the normal tenure shall be for one year only.
c)    The tenure of officers in Central Excise and Service Tax Audit Commissionerates shall be 2 years in group and one year in Circle HQ / Commissionerate HQ. However, exception may be considered by the Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner as per requirement.
d)    In LTU Mumbai the officers posted in Hqrs and GLT shall be rotated on a yearly basis. In LTU audit rotation shall be carried out annually. However, based on administrative requirements, Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner, LTU / LTU-Audit may allow the officer to continue in a GLT / Group for more than one year. 

5.4       The normal tenure in Chief Commissioner’s Office shall be of one year, which may be extended as per the requirement of the concerned Chief Commissioner/Administration.  This posting will be treated as non-sensitive. Normally, the tenure in Chief Commissioner’s Office shall  be included in the zonal tenure. However, based on the administrative exigencies, the Chief Commissioner may exclude it from the zonal tenure of the officer.
 

        6.       GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR COMPUTING TENURE IN A ZONE / COMMISSIONERATE 

        6.1  While computing the afore-said tenure and for period of cumulative stay in a Zone/Commissionerate the tenure of service by an officer in the cadres of Gr. B Gazetted and Non-Gazetted in a Zone/Commissionerate at a stretch in one cadre shall be considered. 

        6.2       While computing the afore-said tenure at a stretch in one cadre, the tenure will be counted irrespective of the present and erstwhile formations of Service Tax. 

        6.3    While computing the afore-said tenure and/or period of cumulative stay in a Zone/Commissionerate the tenure of service of an officer in M & P Wing of the Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate/Deputation and other posting on loan basis shall not be counted.  

        6.4       While computing the aforesaid tenure and/or period of cumulative stay in a Zone/Commissionerate, the period served under suspension, if any, by the officer shall not be counted.

        

       7.         TRANSFER/POSTING TO LARGE TAX-PAYER UNIT(LTU)/LTU-AUDIT 

7.1  The cadre-control cell of the Cadre Controlling Authority will maintain a common seniority list consisting of all officers of Mumbai Central Excise Cadre Control (excluding officers posted in Pune Zone and Nagpur Zone), separately for Superintendents and Inspectors, for the purpose of posting to LTU/LTU Audit, Mumbai. The subject Roster/Seniority List shall be circulated to all the Commissionerates every quarter. 

7.2  Officers will be posted to LTU/LTU-Audit based on their seniority in this list, irrespective of where they are posted when they are due for transfer to LTU/LTU Audit. However, officers working in M&P and Pune postings will be posted only after completion of their tenure. 

        7.3    Postings in LTU/ LTU-Audit, Mumbai, will not be treated as a posting in any of the Central Excise Zones in Mumbai, or Service Tax Zone. The tenure in LTU/LTU Audit will therefore not be counted towards tenure in any other Zone. 

7.4       The tenure of posting of officers to LTU and LTU-Audit shall be two years. While computing the aforesaid tenure, leave period in excess of total of 60 days excluding CL during the period of service in LTU shall not be counted.  

7.5   An officer who was posted to LTU/LTU-Audit from a Central Excise / Service Tax Zone should, after completion of tenure in LTU/LTU-Audit, be posted back to the same Zone from where the officer was posted to LTU/LTU-Audit, to complete the Zonal tenure. 

        7.6    Officers in the grade of Superintendent shall be selected for posting to LTU by applying the following criteria sequentially:-

i.  Superintendents who have not worked in LTU in the grade of Inspector or Superintendent shall be posted to LTU.

ii. Taking into consideration the health issues of officers, the upper age limit for posting of Superintendent and Inspector to M&P Wing/LTU/LTU-Audit/Pune shall be 56 years at the time of issue of order. 

7.7   The officers in the grade of Inspector with minimum service of three years in the grade alone shall be considered for posting to LTU. 

7.8  Notwithstanding the guidelines as above, officers on promotion may be considered for transfer and posting to LTU in terms of the guidelines detailed in clause 9 hereunder.  

7.9  Officers working in LTU/LTU Audit will not be transferred to M&P Wing during their tenure in LTU/LTU Audit. However, on completion of their tenure in LTU/LTU Audit, they may be posted to M&P Wing as per their seniority in the roster.

 

8.    TRANSFER/POSTING TO MARINE & PREVENTIVE WING  

8.1  The cadre-control cell of the Cadre Controlling Authority will maintain a common seniority list consisting of all officers of Mumbai Central Excise Cadre Control (excluding officers posted in Pune Zone and Nagpur Zone), separately for Superintendents and Inspectors, for the purpose of posting to M&P Wing of Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate, Mumbai. The Seniority List will be communicated to all the Commissionerates every quarter. 

8.2  Officers will be posted to M&P Wing based on their seniority in this list, irrespective of where they are posted when they are due for transfer to M&P Wing. However, officers working in LTU/LTU-Audit when they become due for posting to M&P Wing will be posted only after completion of their tenure in LTU/LTU Audit.   

8.3  Postings to M&P Wing will be issued by the Cadre Controlling Authority. 

8.4  The tenure of posting in M&P Wing shall be for a period of two years. 

8.5  While computing the afore-said tenure in M&P Wing, the period of total leave (other than C.L.) in excess of 60 days shall not be counted.  

8.6  The upper age limit for posting of Superintendents and Inspectors to M&P Wing shall be 56 years at the time of order. 

8.7  The officers in the grade of Superintendent shall be selected for posting to M&P Wing by applying the following criteria sequentially:-

(i)            Officers who have not worked in M&P Wing in the grade of Inspector or Superintendent shall be posted to M&P.
(ii)          In case sufficient number of officers is not available as above at (i),  officers who have already worked for period less than one year in  M&P Wing shall be posted.
(iii)         In case sufficient number of -officers are not available as above at (i) and (ii), officers who have already worked as Inspectors in M&P Wing for a period of upto one year shall be posted. 

8.8   The number of lady officers posted at any given point of time to M&P Wing shall not exceed 1/3rd of the total officers posted to M&P Wing at that point of time. 

8.9  Keeping in view the nature of work in M&P Wing, no officer recruited against the quota of physically challenged persons shall be posted, unless such officer has expressed his/her willingness in writing. 

8.10   Officers against whom vigilance cases involving impingement of integrity shall not be posted to M&P. However, there shall not be any bar on the posting of officers to M&P Wing if the proceedings initiated against an officer are in the nature of administrative action without any allegations on their integrity. At the time of posting of such officers to M&P Wing, the Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) Mumbai may be informed of- the fact of pending vigilance enquiry. 

8.11  On repatriation from M&P Wing, officers will as far as possible, be posted to the same Zone from which they were posted to M&P Wing.
 

        9.     POSTING OF OFFICERS ON PROMOTION  

        9.1  The officers working in a Commissionerate on promotion from Group ‘B’ Non‑Gazetted to Gazetted cadre shall, normally, be transferred out of the Commissionerate. 

       9.2   If the vacancies in the post of Superintendent necessitate that officers are posted out of Mumbai on promotion to Superintendent, they will be posted out to Pune Zone or to Nasik/Aurangabad/Nagpur-II Audit Commissionerate. 

       9.3  For the purposes of selecting officers, on promotion being posted to the Zones outside Mumbai, a separate roster containing the names of all the officers promoted shall be maintained and the junior-most officers in the said roster will be posted outside Mumbai by the Cadre Controlling Authority. 

       9.4  The minimum tenure of an officer posted from Mumbai Central Excise Zone-I/II or Service Tax Zone to Pune Zone or Nasik/Aurangabad/Nagpur-II Audit Commissionerate shall be one year. 

       9.5  While computing the afore-said tenure of one year the period of total leave (other than C.L.) in excess of 30 days shall not be counted towards tenure. 

        9.6    An officer who has not been transferred out of Mumbai as above on account of any grounds shall continue to remain in the list of officers due for transfer out of Mumbai, in the roster and will be considered for transfer out as and when those grounds no more exist.  

        9.7    On repatriation of such officers who have completed the specified tenure or in case of those officers who are repatriated pre-maturely, the next junior in the roster, irrespective of the fact that he had been promoted in an earlier order, shall be transferred out to the Zones out of Mumbai.  

        9.8   On repatriation officers shall normally be posted back to the Zone from which they were transferred out of Mumbai.  

 

       10.  DEPUTATION OF OFFICERS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS/POSTING ON LOAN BASIS TO OTHER OFFICES  

         10.1  Cadre clearance for deputation to offices under the CBEC/outside organizations shall be  through Cadre Controlling Authority. Requests for extension in tenure (One year) on deputation will  be decided by the Chief Commissioner of the Zone.  

        10.2  The officers on repatriation from the deputation posts shall report to the Chief Commissioner’s Office, (Cadre Controlling Authority).          

10.3    The officers shall be posted on loan basis initially for one year (except to DRI/DGCEI), which shall be further extended, on yearly basis, if needed, with due concurrence from the CCA.  In case of posting of officers on loan basis to DRI/DGCEI, the officers shall be posted, on loan basis, initially for two years, which shall be further extended for one year, at a time, if needed, with due concurrence from the CCA.

10.4    Officers who are posted in M&P, LTU, LTU-Audit can give their willingness to work on deputation basis in all investigation agencies such as DRI/DGCEI/Airport/CBI/Enforcement Directorate etc. (sensitive postings) and which will be considered by the Administration.  On return from deputation, the officer should be posted back to the parent formation to complete the tenure in the formation where he was posted prior to going on deputation.
 

         11.     GENERAL GUIDELINES ON TRANSFER / POSTING OF OFFICERS IN COMMISSIONERATES  

         11.1    Subject to administrative exigencies and the approval of the Zonal Chief Commissioner, the tenure of an officer in a post categorized as sensitive shall not, ordinarily exceed a period of two years.  

         11.2     Officers shall, as far as possible, be rotated between posts categorized as sensitive and non-sensitive. However, in case sufficient number of officers are not available due to administrative/vigilance reasons, for being posted to sensitive charges, officers may be considered for being posted from one sensitive charge to another sensitive charge with the approval of Zonal Chief Commissioner. 

         11.3   Officers should be rotated between the Headquarters/Division/Ranges so that all officers have the experience of working in the field/headquarters within a Commissionerate.
 

         12.    MISCELLANEOUS  

         12.1     Officers having, less than two years of service before retirement on superannuation may be considered, as far as possible, for being posted to a Commissionerate near to residence subject to administrative exigencies. 

         12.2     In the case of requests for retention in a particular station/formation within the Zone on the ground that his/her child is studying in Class-X or Class-XII, the Chief Commissioner may consider such requests subject to administrative exigencies only if the officer is considered for posting outside Mumbai.  

      12.3 Notwithstanding, anything contained in this policy, Cadre Controlling Chief Commissioner, the Zonal/Jurisdictional Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner/Commissioner may, if necessary in public interest and/or in view of administrative exigencies, transfer and post any officer to any post within his competency. 

12.4  No government servant shall bring or attempt to bring any political or other outside influence to bear upon any superior authority to further his/her interest in respect of matters pertaining to his/her transfer or posting. Violation of above provisions amounts to misconduct as per the CCS (Conduct) Rules and the Government servant shall be liable to be proceeded against accordingly. 

12.5    The History of Postings (HoP) & all other personal data of all officers covered by this policy are to be maintained through the online version of the GEMS Salary software, so that there is seamless movement of the officers on transfer to other zones/formations. 

12.6    All grievances arising out of the implementation of this policy may be addressed to the Cadre Controlling Authority.
**********************

Monday, July 11, 2016

DEFERRING OF THE INDEFINITE STRIKE – CLARIFICATIONS

M. Krishnan, Secretary General,
Confederation of C. G. Employees & Workers

Dear Comrades,

We are in receipt of messages and emails from our grass root leaders and workers conveying their concerns over the decision of NJCA to defer the indefinite strike. Comments are circulated in other social medias like whats app etc. also. As it is not practically possible to reply to all the queries and comments, to put the record straight, we are clarifying below the common points raised by most of our comrades and well-wishers. We sincerely thank all those leaders, comrades and well-wishers, who have conveyed (and still conveying) their views, opinions, criticisms and concerns to the confederation CHQ.

1. CONVEYING THE DEFERMENT OF THE STRIKE EVEN BEFORE THE NJCA FORMALLY ANNOUNCED IT:

NJCA has taken serious note of this incident and shall take precautionary measures in future.

2. WHETHER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CABINET DECISION ON 7TH CPC RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE DELAYED FURTHER FOR FOUR MONTHS

The question of keeping in abeyance the implementation of the Cabinet decision on 29th June 2016 regarding 7th CPC recommendations, till the High Level Committee submits its report to Govt, was discussed in the NJCA meeting. It is decided that NJCA should not demand it, as the employees may be put to hardship, especially those who are in the verge of retirement. Com Shiv Gopal Misra, Convenor, NJCA has confirmed from the Finance Ministry that Govt notification on 7th CPC recommendations is under process and it will be issued shortly, payment may be made from August salary.

3. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EMPOWERED COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED EARLIER AND THE NEW HIGH LEVEL COMMITTEE?

The new High Level Committee is the product of the discussion held by Group of Ministers including Home Minister, Finance Minister and Railway Minister with NJCA leaders after announcement of the Cabinet decision, in the wake of an impending indefinite strike. Govt is compelled to appoint the new Committee, as the decision taken by the Govt on the proposals submitted by the Empowered Committee headed by Cabinet Secretary (details of proposals of ECoS is not known to staff side) is not acceptable to the NJCA. Hence the new Committee shall be to reconsider the decision of the Govt. especially regarding minimum wage and fitment formula. Inspite of the assurance of the Groups of Ministers that the Committee is being constituted to reconsider the Govt. decision, if the Govt. again reject our demand, the NJCA have to reconsider its stand and deferred strike shall be revived.

4. POSITION REGARDING ALLOWANCES

All allowances including HRA, transport allowance, fixed medical allowance to pensioners etc. are referred to a committee headed by Finance Secretary. Committee shall submit its report within four months. Pending final decision based on the report of the Committee, all existing allowances to be paid as per the existing rates in existing pay structure. Govt. may try to deny arrears of revised rate of allowances by implementing it from prospective date as in the past. This issue will be further discussed by the NJCA with the proposed Committee.

5. WE WOULD HAVE GOT A BETTER SETTLEMENT IF NJCA HAS GONE AHEAD WITH THE INDEFINITE STRIKE

All of us are aware that NJCA is not a monolithic, composite organization. It is a united forum of independent organisation. Each Federation has its own identity and individuality and take decision as per the direction of the managing bodies of each organization. Hence different views may emerge in the NJCA, but final decision is taken by consensus. If each organization stick on to its own stand and others to follow it, there is no question of consensus and NJCA will not exist.

With all its inherent weakness and limitations, the NJCA has successfully challenged the NDA Govt’s stand that there is no negotiation with the staff side on the 7th CPC recommendations. Govt. thought that once the Cabinet decision is announced unilaterally, followed by unleashing of well-orchestrated media propaganda that big bonanza is given for Central Govt. Employees, the NJCA will be forced to withdraw its indefinite strike decision. But the calculation of the Govt went wrong. NJCA took a firm stand that unless and until the retrograde recommendations especially minimum wage and fitment formula is modified, there is no question of withdrawing the strike. All the Federations are firm on this demand which ultimately compelled the Hon’ble Prime Minister to intervene. (NJCA has written to Hon’ble Prime Minister for intervention even before the Cabinet decision, but the Govt. ignored the NJCA’s appeal at that time). As per the direction of the Hon’ble Prime Minister, Hon’ble Home Minister Sri Rajnath Singh, Finance Minister Sri Arun Jaitly and Railway Minister Sri Suresh Prabhu discussed the main issues raised in the Charter of demands with NJCA leaders, and assured that Govt. will appoint a High Level Committee to reconsider the decision of the Govt., especially on minimum pay and fitment formula. This assurance was given with the approval of Hon’ble Prime Minster.

Inspite of it, the NJCA has not deferred the strike and insisted written confirmation of the assurance regarding constitution of High Level Committee. Again Hon’ble Home Minister Sri Rajnath Singh called the NJCA leaders and reiterated the earlier assurances and informed that the Finance Minister will issue a press statement confirming the assurance given to NJCA. Only after receipt of the copy of the press statement issued by the Finance Ministry, NJCA has deferred the strike till the finalization of the report of High Level Committee.

As the Hon’ble Prime Minister of our country has intervened and as three Cabinet Ministers of Govt. of India discussed the demands with NJCA leaders and gave assurance that the demands, especially minimum pay and fitment formula will be reconsidered, and as the Home Minister has again reiterated the assurances to NJCA leaders and Finance Minster has issued press statement confirming the constitution of High Level Committee, the NJCA felt that before embarking upon an indefinite strike which is the last weapon in the hands of the workers, we should give time to the Govt. to implement the Minister’s assurances given as per the direction of the Prime Minister and honour its commitment given to NJCA leaders. NJCA taking a stand that we don’t believe the Ministers and their assurance and shall go ahead with the strike, may not be taken in good spirit by the general public and the media. In case the Govt. backs out from its assurances, the NJCA has got every right to revive the deferred indefinite strike.

Com. Shiva Gopal Mishra, Convenor, NJCA has made it clear in the circular issued on 7th July 2016, which reads as follows: –

“Though there is positive assurance from the Govt. of India, but all of you will not take rest and assume counseling the cadre and ground staff that they should remain in full preparedness, because if there will not be SATISFACTORY OUTCOME, we will be having no alternative except to agitate the issues again.”

6. WHAT ABOUT PARITY IN PENSION? WILL IT BE IMPLEMENTED AS THERE IS A CLAUSE IN THE GOVT DECISION THAT THE PROPOSED COMMITTEE WILL EXAMINE THE FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OPTION No I, ie PARITY IN PENSION TO PAST PENSIONERS

This issue was raised before the Group of Minister by Com. K. K. N. Kutty, who is also the Secretary General of NCCPA (National Co-ordination Committee of Pensioners Associations). It was pointed out to the Finance Minister that even though the Govt. has decided to accept 7th CPC recommendation to have two options to pensioners, it is qualified with the words “subject to feasibility.” The Finance Minister categorically assured the delegation that the Govt. has accepted the recommendations in toto and the Pension Department has only been asked to sort out the difficulties in implementation of the Option-No-I, if any.

7. WHAT ABOUR DEMANDS OF THE GRAMIN DAK SEVAKS, AS NJCA IS MORE CONCERNED WITH MINIMUM PAY FITMENT FORMULA ONLY

Any increase in the minimum pay and fitment formula for departmental employees (MTS, Postman & PA) will be extended to Gramin Dak Sevaks also proportionately as the GDS Pay Scales are decided based on the pay scales of corresponding category of departmental employees. So, the demand to increase minimum pay and fitment formula of MTS, Postman and PA is equally important for GDS also.

As regards, civil servant status the NJCA has raised this demand before the Govt and 7th CPC. Even though the 7th CPC Chairman, Retired Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur has informed the JCM staff side leaders he will not consider the GDS case as they are not included in the terms of reference of the Commission, the Chairman gave a very damaging recommendation to the Govt. that GDS are not Civil Servants but they are part – time employees and Extra-departmental agents. He further stated that all the GDS are having another main independent income from another source and GDS job is only a side-business. NJCA leaders have raised the issue of GDS before the Cabinet Secretary’s Committee and also before the Group of Ministers. We shall again raise the issue before the proposed high level committee also. Govt. has constituted a separate committee for GDS under the Chairmanship of Retired Postal Board Member Sri Kamalesh Chandra. NFPE, AIPEU-GDS and Confederation has submitted detailed memorandum before the Committee and Secretary General NFPE Com. R. N Parashar, General Secretary AIPEU-GDS Com, P. Panduranga Rao along with other leaders has given evidence before the GDS Committee demanding Civil Servant status. The GDS committee will submit its report before December 2016. Further NFPE and AIPEU-GDS has filed a case in the Supreme Court for grant of Civil Servant status. Supreme Court has transferred the case to Delhi High Court which in turn transferred it to Principal Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi. The final argument of the case will take place on 25th July 2016. NJCA, Confederation, NFPE and AIPEU – GDS are jointly trying their level best to get justice to three lakhs Gramin Dak Sevaks of the Postal Department. If the GDS Committee report is against the GDS, then definitely NJCA and Confederation will be fully supporting the agitational programmes of NFPE & AIPEU-GDS including indefinite strike.

The main hurdle is the policy of the NDA Govt. as the Communication Minister of NDA Govt. has rejected our demand for grant of Civil Servant status to GDS.

M. KRISHNAN
Secretary General,
Confederation of Central Govt Employees & Workers

Thursday, July 7, 2016

GOVT. ASSURANCES... HOPE IT IS RELIABLE


Seeking better pay and higher allowances, at least 33 Lakh central government employees threatened to go on strike on July 11.

The Central Government on Wednesday assured representatives of the employee unions to look into the issues raised by them, following the implementation of the 7th Pay Commission’s recommendations and therefore the strike call for the 11-July-2016 was deferred.

The union members expressed unhappiness over the Government’s decision to increase the minimum pay to just Rs 18,000. They are currently demanding that the pay be raised to at least Rs 26,000 at a fitment formula of 3.68, as against the cabinet approval of 2.52. If the said ratio increases, then the proportionate increase in the calculation will definitely have escalating effects.

The government on its part has setup a High Level Committee to review the demands. The employees are also demanding withdrawal of the new national pension scheme (NPS), which came into effect from October 2004. The Committee is to submit its report within four months.

It was rumoured that before the Cabinet approval, the Govt. does not want to implement the new pay scales before Diwali. Now the situation is just like a bitter pill which cannot be swallowed nor spat out. The Govt. succeeded in its aim to defer the issue and was also successful in putting the brakes on the All India Association/Federation agitation programmes.

The present Govt. appears to be more qualified, both educationally and experience-wise, as compared to the previous regime. 33 Lakhs of employees who have dedicated their lives definitely should have a say in the matter of their pay and allowances and these are not to be compared with the employees of private organisations, who have less loyalty to their organisations and will jump ship whenever a higher salary is offered.

The current mindset in the corridors of power is that the starting salaries at the junior levels of Govt. service are much higher as compared to the private sector. Therefore, there is an attempt to lower the salaries at the entry levels, where the numbers of entrants are high and to enhance the salaries and perks at Grp-A levels, which constitutes less than 10% of the total work force. 

More than the inequality & the unfairness of the new pay recommendations, it is the perpetuation of the notion of superiority of the Grp-A officers that they are the policy makers and hence deserve higher pay... BUT THEY DON'T DECIDE POLICY, THE POLITICIANS DO...  They would like to equate themselves with the politicians and give themselves higher pay rises and perks as compared to the junior officers

Why don’t they think the other way around, i.e. if bright young minds are to be lured into joining the Govt. service at the lower ranks (other than Grp-A) then higher pay has to be offered as an incentive for them, so that their future interests are safeguarded and secured. This will result in having competent and motivated staff which will result in better governance as majority of the public dealings/ground/field work are done with the lower level staff and not at the Grp-A levels.

On the other hand if the Grp-A officers feel that they are underpaid as compared to their counterparts in the private sector, then they are free to leave the Govt. service and join the private sector, if they think they can sustain themselves there.

Now, as the strike has been deferred, our All India body has enough time to introspect and take a decision, whether to go along-with the apex federation of the central govt. employees or not.
 
****************

Monday, July 4, 2016

MOVE BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE...

11-July-2016 is nearing and all the employees of Cental Govt. are gearing up to lodge their protest by way of an indefinite strike against the retrograde 7th CPC recommendations.

The news of strike are in the headlines but the Govt. does not seem to be perturbed about this. The habit of giving assurances, setting up committees and buying of time by the govt. may not work this time.  Employees have realized that the Govt. is ditching them on every count and the level of trust between the employer and the employees is eroding…

All of us here in Mumbai strongly feel that we should stand united with the apex federation for central govt. employees and heed the call of the indefinite strike call from the11-July onwards.
Understanding the recommendations of the 7th CPC does not require knowledge of rocket science, a lay man can understand that the Govt. is fooling its own employees and at the same time making them out to be villains in the eyes of the public about their worthiness… Time is running out – Hoping that, by not joining the strike call, will be an act of cowardice.
In CBEC, our cadre of Supdt.’s Association is much more organized. When other cadres have issued notice, then why we should lag behind ? 

Tests are there and without appearing for it, neither anyone can pass nor can hope to qualify. 

The recommendations of the lowest salary slab of the 7th CPC is their gimmick, then forget about increases in the other grades. The politicians have increased their pay & perks in unanimity irrespective of their party affiliations, but for us they are in silent mode. Further, they want to break the momentum by giving false information and creating more committees to look into contentious  issues, thereby wasting more time and to break the unity and solidarity. 

CESA-Mum appeals to its apex body - time is precious - please do not waste the opportunity and hesitate to participate in the strike alongwith our brother officers of the central govt.
*************************

Saturday, July 2, 2016

What if Indian Railways comes to a halt?


Imagine you wake up one morning and come to know that the trains are not running. Sceptical at even the thought of it? It may just come true if the 1.3 million employees of Indian Railways decide to act on a threat to go on an indefinite strike from 11 July.

A strike by workers of the national transporter, India’s largest employer, will virtually cripple life in a country where 23 million passengers and over 1,100 million tonnes of freight are carried daily by the railway.

The spark for the strike threat is the cabinet’s approval on Wednesday for recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission. The National Joint Council of Action, a confederation of central government employee organisations that claim a membership of 3.3 million, said it wasn’t happy with the minimum pay of Rs.18,000 that has been approved. Although a hefty hike from the Rs.7,000 minimum pay that central government staff earned earlier, it fell short of the Rs.26,000 demanded by the council. Railway employees form a major chunk of the 3.3 million employees it claims to represent.

In February this year, the All-India Railwaymen’s Federation (AIRF) conducted a secret ballot for its members to decide the future course of action if its demands weren’t met. In the secret ballot, 95% of the 900,000 railwaymen from all over the country who cast their ballots supported a strike. These employees included railway men from all over the country including 17 zones and 7 production units of Indian Railways.

In 1974, railway employees demanding a wage increase staged a strike that crippled life in the country for almost three weeks.

“It was a 20-day strike and people and commodities couldn’t move an inch,” recalled Jasbir Singh, a resident of Punjab who bore witness to that strike.

“There was a lot of bloodshed and protests, from what we heard in the news on radio, as TV was a luxury at that time. Power cuts, water shortage, food prices being doubled and tripled...People were stranded and it took months to clear the backlog in passenger and freight traffic.”

Indian Railways is one of the largest transportation and logistics networkss in the world, operating some 19,000 trains daily, including 7,000 freight trains, over 65,000 kilometres of routes across 7,146 railway stations.

Out of the total freight carried by the railway, major commodities are coal, cement, iron and steel, foodgrains, oil and fertilizer.

V. Krishna Ananth who teaches history at Sikkim University, Gangtok, and recently wrote a paper in Economic and Political Weekly on ‘Remembering May 1974-The Historic Railway Workers’ Strike’ says, “Realise the strength which Railwaymen possess. Seven days’ strike of the Indian Railways, every thermal station in the country would close down. A 10 days’ strike of the Indian Railways, every steel mill in India would close down and industries in the country would come to a halt for the next 12 months. If once the steel mill furnace is switched off, it takes nine months to re-fire. A fifteen days’ strike in Indian Railways, and the country will starve.”

The All India Railwaymen’s Federation wants the prime minister’s intervention to avert such a situation.

“We gave several representations to the government...and opened several channels for negotiation but the government turned a blind eye. We have no other alternative now but to go on indefinite strike from 11 July and now an intervention at PM-level is the only way to resolve the crisis that has been created,” says Shiva Gopal Mishra, general secretary of the union, Railway employee unions have other demands related to payment of a productivity-linked bonus, pension and a One Rank, One Pension (OROP) scheme like the one approved for defence forces.

“The government has been indifferent to railway employees despite we being the lifeline of the country. Our hard work is not being paid and around 11 lakh railway employees especially those who have joined from 1 January 2004 are in age group of 20-40 years. The young blood is not ready to compromise in any way,” said M Raghavaiah of the National Federation of Indian Railwaymen (NFIR).

The government is hoping the threat of a strike will pass.

“Such threats have been given earlier too and it might be possible that the unions back-track..You can’t be sure of a strike as of now,” a railway board member said on condition of anonymity.

Railway minister Suresh Prabhu met union leaders on Wednesday and he will likely defuse the situation, the member said.

Still, do give it a thought. What if Indian Railways comes to a halt? 

(Courtesy : From Sources)