Deciding first appeals against RTI replies without hearing
the appellant by a public authority is illegal, the Central Information
Commission has said in against the Law Ministry .Under the Right to
Information Act, an appellant gets a chance to appeal twice against of the
Central Public Information Officer who receives and answers the application. The
First Appeal is filed before an officer,
to CPIO, within the department
where application is filed. The Second appeal is filed before the Central
Information Commission. It is a common practice that at the First Appeal stage,
public authorities do not invite applicants for hearing and decide the case on
the basis of appeal filed by them.
The order of Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu
may help in curbing the practice of deciding the first appeals without giving a
chance to the applicant to explain himself during the hearing. The case relates
to number of RTI applications filed by activist R K Jain from the Law
Ministry."Passing orders in first appeal without hearing or sending
hearing notice is illegal and will render the order invalid. The Commission
sets aside the order of First Appellate Authority for violating RTI Act and breach
of natural justice by denying the appellant a chance of presenting his case and by raising entirely a new defence which was never
claimed," Acharyulu said in the order He said, "It deserves action
though the concerned officer retired from service and recommends Public
Authority to initiate disciplinary action against the concerned FAO for acting totally against the RTI Act
in this case".
Source: PTI
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.