Monday, December 21, 2015

THIN LINE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AND RIGHT...





     No DPC has been held from 2014 – as on date there are  1750+ posts which are lying vacant due to retirement of officers promoted on temporary/adhoc basis. Board is dilly-dallying holding of DPC on the pretext of litigation.

     The OA filed in Principal Bench of CAT, New Delhi, was scheduled to be heard on 17.12.2015 and adjourned to 18.12.2015. Some drama took place and thereafter it was listed for hearing on 22.12.2015. All are having their eyes on the decision of the Principal CAT.

     We are receiving lot of queries in this regard. In various CAT, CBEC has submitted and have sought adjournment of hearing to obtain an opinion on the “law of the land” with respect to reservation in promotions. 

    Accordingly, the Board sought an opinion from the Solicitor General of India on 26.10.2015 and in response to their query, he has submitted his opinion on 31.10.2015. The gist of the queries raised & replies given are as under :-

1. Whether the interim order dated 03.09.2014 (which has subsequently been modified on 22.09.2015) passed by the CAT, Chandigarh Bench will be applicable throughout the country in all the offices of CBEC with regard to promotion of Superintendents of Central Excise and Customs to the grade of Assistant Commissioners, Central Excise, basis of which is the All India Seniority List of the feeder grades?

2. What is the “law of the land” for reservation in matters of promotion to any class or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of SC/ST?

3. Whether reservation in matters of promotion to any class or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of SC/ST candidates can be provided by the State without taking the  necessary steps to satisfy the compelling reasons as mandated by the Hon’ble Apex Court in M. Nagaaraj case while upholding the validity of the Constitution (77th Amendment) Act, 1995, the Constitution (81st Amendment) Act, 2000 and the Constitution (85th Amendment) Act, 2001 and the judgments of the Apex Court in case of Suraj Bhan Meena v. State of Rajastan and U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Kumar or any other relevant judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court?

4. Whether reservation in matters of promotion to the post of Assistant Commissioners, Customs & Central Excise, in the services under the State can be provided in favour of SC/ST candidates by the State (Central Government) in view of the answer to the issues mentioned at 2 & 3 above?

The opinion of the Solicitor General of India, to the above queries, in brief is as follows:

“B. The “Law of the Land” with respect to Reservation in Promotion (Queries 2, 3 and 4)

Queries 2, 3 and 4 are inter-linked and may be looked into together.

….
….
…. The inescapable conclusion from this is that the empirical study as required by M. Nagaraj (supra) is a must and cannot be abraded from. Any departure from it will not be allowed by the Apex Court.

Ergo, in my considered view, although reservation may be permitted for promotions from the feeder grades to the post of Assistant Commissioner, it will be subject to the necessary steps as required by M. Nagaraj (Supra)”

**************************

    
     On the issue of promotion, the stand of the present Government as reflected in the answer to a query in the Parliament is also as under:

RAJYA SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 1377 - RESERVATION IN PROMOTIONS FOR SC/ST RAISED BY SHRI RAHMAN KHAN
 (a) the stand of Government on reservation in promotion cases involving Central Government employees; and

(b)  what is latest order issued by Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) in the matter?

DR. JITENDRA SINGH Minister of State in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and Minister of State answered as follows:

(a)  & (b): The reservation in promotion is provided to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) at the rate of 15% and 7.5% respectively in posts and services under the Central Government.
       As on 01.01.2013, the representation of SCs and STs
       was 17.55% and 7.72% respectively.

     The Hon’ble Supreme Court, on 19.10.2006, in the matter of M. Nagaraj & Ors. V/s Union of India, while upholding the validity of the Constitutional Amendments made in favour of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, inter-alia, observed that the State will have to collect quantifiable data of backwardness, inadequacy of representation before providing reservations in promotion.

    In order to provide impediment free reservations in promotion to SCs and STs, the 117th Constitutional (Amendment) Bill, 2012 was introduced in the Rajya Sabha by the Government in September, 2012. The Bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha on 17.12.2012 and transmitted to the Lok Sabha for consideration and passing. The Bill could not be considered in the 15th Lok Sabha and lapsed on the dissolution of 15th Lok Sabha. 

     The issues emanating from the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment dated 19.10.2006 in M. Nagaraj case is under examination.


********************

2 comments:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.