Diluted GST will have limited efficacy
It
is heartening that Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has managed to break the
stalemate with States on the Goods and Services (GST) tax rates, but the
plethora of tax slabs to satisfy the myriad demands of States has diluted its
benefits. Only time will tell how efficacious the new GST scheme of things will
prove to be but it is clear that the original high hopes on GST stand moderated
now. The complexity will compromise the boost to growth and undermine its
reliability as a revenue generator. Yet, if there is anything that could
deliver on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s jobs and growth agenda it is the GST
reform which will roll out on April 1, 2017, much to the Centre’s relief. The
GST Council, set up to oversee the tax, has agreed on a more steeply
progressive structure for goods than earlier foreseen with rates of 5, 12, 18,
and 28 per cent, depending on the kind of product involved. The standard rates
of 12 per cent and 18 per cent proposed at the Council’s earlier meeting have
been retained, but the highest and lowest tax slabs have been tweaked from 26
per cent to 28 per cent and 6 per cent to 5 per cent, respectively with which
the States have willy-nilly agreed. The concerns of States that levy Value
Added Tax at 5 per cent on items of mass consumption were met by lowering the
threshold GST rate. Food grain and other items considered essential, that
together constitute roughly half the consumer price inflation index, have been
exempted from GST. Since inflation is a tax on the poor and indirect taxes are
regressive, this would help check worries about inflationary repercussions. The
cess over and above GST to be levied on luxury and sin goods is a measure of
doubtful usefulness. The government contends that the cess will help compensate
States for five years and that the Council can take a call on doing away with
it thereafter. That is only a patchwork solution. On the multiple tax rates too
a simplified solution would need to be found in due course. A single GST rate
may be non-feasible but there is no harm in striving to move towards it for
optimum benefit. Internationally, there is the norm of a single GST rate. All
in all, given the constraints of satisfying various States it is good that a
beginning has been made. It would, however be wise to build upon it.
From
Sources:-
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.