Govt panel for merging CBDT and CBEC
Posted on Tuesday, June
17, 2014 8:37 PM
TARC headed by Parthasarathi Shome recommends abolishing of Revenue
Secretary post.
The Tax Administration Reform Commission (TARC),
headed by Parthasarathi Shome, also said the retrospective amendments to tax
laws should be avoided as a principle and Income Tax
Return should also include wealth tax details.
The panel, which has submitted its first report to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley,
also pitched for a separatebudget allocation to
ensure time bound tax refund and a passbook scheme for TDS (Tax
Deduction at Source).
“The post of revenue secretary should be abolished. The present
functions of the Department of Revenue should be allocated to
the two Boards (CBDT and CBEC). This would empower the tax departments to
carry out their assigned responsibilities efficiently,” the report said.
The tax administration, it added, needs to have greater functional
and financial autonomy and independence from governmental
structures, given their special needs.
It said, the revenue secretary, an IAS, is
“likely to have little experience or background in tax administration at the
national level and little familiarity with tax.”
The 550-page report further said the two Boards must embark on
“selective convergences immediately to achieve better tax governance, and, in
next five years, move towards a unified management structure with a
common Boardfor
both direct and indirect taxes, called the Central Board
of Direct and Indirect Taxes”.
On PAN, the report said it should be developed as a common business
identification number (CBIN), to be used by other government departments also
such as customs, central
excise, service tax, DGFT and
EPFO.
“Both central excise and service tax should be covered under a
single registration as
both the taxes are administered by the same department and cross utilisation of
credit is permitted between central excise and service tax under the CENVAT
credit rules,” it said.
The panel further said it is also necessary to provide for
de-registration, cancellation or surrender of registration numbers and PAN.
It said the approach to retrospective amendments has resulted in
protracted disputes, apart from having deeply harmful effects on investment sentiment
and the macro economy and recommended “retrospective amendment should be avoided as a principle.
The panel suggested I-T returns should also include wealth tax return
so that the taxpayer need not separately file wealth
tax returns. These returns should also be processed together in the CPC at
Bengaluru.
Besides, it called for a dedicated organisation for
delivery of taxpayer services with customer focus and
made a strong case for “pre-filled tax returns”.
PTI
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.