Central
Excise Superintendents’ Association, Mumbai
Unit
of AIACEGEO
( Recognized
under F. No. B-12017/10/206-Ad-IV A dtd. 21-01-2008 ).
V.A. Kolhatkar, President A.K. Sasmal-General Secretary
|
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Mumbai I, II,
III, V, Thane I, II, Belapur,
Raigad, Customs Prev,, Service Tax – I & II Comm’te & L.T.U. Mumbai.
Ref : CESA/30/2013
Dtd : 18.06.2013
Ms. Lipika Majumdar,
Hon’ble
Member(Service Tax),
CBEC,
New Delhi.
Respected
Madam,
Sub:-
Infrastructure and working conditions in
Service Tax Commissionerates,
Mumbai
– reg.
Your kind attention is invited to the
long neglected Infrastructure availability, ad-hoc functioning of Service Tax
and staff problems of Mumbai.
In the year 1994 Service Tax was
initially started with 4 services. On experimental basis the office first
started functioning in Mumbai from the 6th floor of the Central
Excise building situated at Churchgate. Since then the collection and growth of
the Service Tax has increased manifold. The Revenue of Service Tax has
increased to a staggering Rs 1,32,388/- Crores to the exchequer in the
financial year 2012-2013.
As on date there are 7 Service Tax
Commissionerates and 18 independent Service Tax Divisions in the country. The
Service Tax collections from the Service Tax Commissionerates, LTU & Raigad
Dn. are Rs. 43,668/- Crores Rs. 2,243/- Crores and Rs.632 Crores, respectively.
In last financial year Chennai Service
Tax Commissionerate having 5 Divisions contributed only Rs.5,946/- Crores. The
Revenue collections of Delhi & Kolkata having more Divisions as compared to
Mumbai are much less than Mumbai.
Not only the revenue, even the number
of assessees in Mumbai are more as compared to other places. As a result, the
number of returns filed, related audit and anti evasion work is also very high.
However, the number of Commissionerates and Divisions does not commensurate to
the quantum of assessee base and the consequent work load. It is beyond
anyone’s comprehension as to how such a huge quantum of work is being handled
with such a small strength of officers working in Mumbai Service Tax having mere
two Commissionerates and six Divisions within the time limit prescribed. The
more agonizing fact is that despite less revenue realization at other places,
the number of Divisions, Infrastructure and Manpower is much better than
Mumbai. The entire approach right from local administration to the Board level
is discriminatory so far as Mumbai is concerned. This is evident from the fact
that since inception of independent Service Tax Commissionerate, not a single
office premises for Service Tax has been acquired or hired by the
Administration. The entire operations of both the Service Tax Commissionerates are
from the existing Central Excise offices on ad-hoc basis.
This Association, CESA Mumbai has repeatedly
brought to the notice of the Administration all these facts. Except for some
minor changes i.e. shifting of one Division to another place after the surprise
visit of the then Chairman Shri V.
Shreedhar nothing has changed.
Madam,
the Department is spending lots of money
in inventing means and methods to draw the attention of the defaulters of
Service Tax by asking them to file returns and to pay Service Tax under ‘Voluntary Compliance Encouragement
Scheme’ (VCES) through advertisements. However, when it comes to
the major Revenue yielding centre like Mumbai, the same Department is not ready
to spend any amount or care to improve the basic infrastructure so as to
provide sufficient working conditions for its own staff.
The Advertisements talk about the
Nation building from the Tax collected, but if the machinery is incapacitated
to collect even the revenue due or allow pilferage of it due to lack of
Infrastructure and Manpower, is it not an offence against the Nation? Who should be held accountable and
responsible for this kind of Revenue Loss? The
Administration is always busy in stereo type mechanized routine work like
preparation of hypothetical estimations, and endless performance reports, etc.,
neglecting the core issues of infrastructure and other basic amenities to the
field staff.
The working conditions in Mumbai are
so pathetic that we feel ashamed to put it in black & white in our
representation time and again that the Administration is not even able to
provide basic amenities such as office space, stationery, Chair & Table,
Computer, Laptop, Internet, Printer, Vehicle & funds for visiting
assessee’s premises for Audit or Anti-Evasion work. The officers of Audit and
Anti-Evasion are being frequently called from their working place at Madhu
Industrial Estate, Worli or Dharavi to Headquarters at Churchgate, forcing the
officers to incur expenses from their own pockets and spend extra time. Due to
tremendous work pressure and poor working conditions apart from Metropolitan
stress, the officers fell sick or face some serious ailments and the apathy is
that the Administration does not have funds to grant timely Medical assistance
to the ailing officers.
During the days of collection of Central excise under physical control, we had to depend on the assessee for stationery, office, vehicles, etc. The situation is not different now, though the Revenue has increased manifold. This is mainly due to the mindset of the administration towards its field staff, which has not changed. There is a need to change the mindset of the administration so that the officers can function properly and deliver the best to the department without felt being neglected.
Madam, still there are lots of issues
to elaborate, but it is felt that the same would not serve any purpose. The
gravity of the above issues can be gauged properly only if your good-self. Spare
some time and visit the offices of Mumbai Service Tax and have interaction with
the officers working there. It is also suggested that you may take out some
time from your tight schedule and meet the family members of the deceased
officers, who have lost their life while serving in the Service Tax Department.
Madam, we have high hopes from you because you are well aware with the Mumbai administration. We hope and expect that the basic problems faced by the Mumbai Service tax staff can be solved only by a determined approach and in a time bound manner.
Apart
from the above, the problems faced by the staff in ACES is annexed to this
letter for your kind perusal and redressal for effective functioning.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely
Encl.: as above.
A.K. Sasmal
General Secretary
Copy to :1. The
DG(HRD), CBEC, New Delhi for kind information and necessary action.
2. The DG(System & Data Management), CBEC,
New Delhi for kind information and necessary action.
3. The Chief Commissioner, Central Excise, Zone-I
/ II, Mumbai for kind information and necessary action.
4. The Commissioner, Service Tax-I & II,
Mumbai for kind information and necessary action.
5. The Secretary General(AIACEGEO), for kind
information and necessary action.
A DETAILED NOTE SUBMITTED ON ACS BY CESA MUMBAI.
A DETAILED NOTE SUBMITTED ON ACS BY CESA MUMBAI.
A(utomation of ) C(entral) E(xcise & ) S(ervice Tax)
Difficulties:
1. ACES
was introduced in 2009 in Central Excise & Service tax by leaving other old
systems and all module brought under one system and it was felt that the entire
tax collection and data compilation work will be on line and will be available
for analysis to everyone in the department at his beck and call. But even after
passing approx. 4 years, all this remain a distant dream. System cannot even
generate a single report out of it and the authority who introduced it are not
themselves sure about the authenticity of the data retrieved that is it correct
or wrong and wants it to obtain even now from assessee and certification from field
officers in the face that we are surprised when find letters to verify the aces
data, do scrutiny of returns manually, or provide revenue realization reports
every now and then from filed formation after spending crores of rupees on
aces. Even the details of Registrant cannot be taken by the jurisdictional
officer.
2. Not
only the above even gets letter that Registration nos are there but returns are
not filed, but many a time it is noticed that registrations are surrendered but
still shown as active in aces as no one bothered to update it and hence such
things are coming.
3. More
over when ever any problem is referred either by officers or by assessee no
response or improper replies or queries are coming forward from the systems
administration and it continues for considerable long time. Help lines are many
a time appears to be helpless lines/hopeless lines for trade and officers both.
4. The Speed
and connectivity is very slow and it takes much time to open page; whereas
authorities who never work on aces or getting their work done from Inspector
and Superintendents found saying that there is no work or it does not take much
time and they put unrealistic targets of scrutiny of returns on officers, and
harass them.
5. System is not design to suit field
formation and details which is necessary for scrutiny or assessment are
not available and display in system; e.g. in returns majority of the time it is
stated in errors that duty payable and paid is not tallying but it is higher or
lower and to what extent no idea, whereas in invoicing and payment of duty
there is rounding off of duty and value both, thus when it is done on every
place such error is bound to occur, display of notification several options are
given and some time notification is valid and existing but aces shows does not
exist or ask for serial no. whereas in notification there is no table or any
serial no.
6. Even it is found that non LTU unit filed
return in LTU, which shows that there is no filtering system to prevent such
patent wrongs and block it at initial stage itself.
7. ACES
System is not officers friendly as Superintendent cannot view all required
details filed by the assessee simultaneously for scrutiny or assessment such as
details of ST payments Challans, Cenvat credit availed and utilized, taxable
and exempted services and notifications etc. e.g. for tracing one challan you
have to go and search on entire record, there is no updating as many a time it
is stated challan does not exists but on scrutiny it is found to be there, that
means at the time of filing of return NSDL data was not linked and updated
hence such errors occurred which could have been avoided and time saved had it
been proper.
8. ACES
System does not provide or show the correct deficiency such as wrong calculation of duty and short or excess
payment ; comparative figures of the assessee for all the period of returns
filed, invoice wise or service wise details of Cenvat credit availed by the
assessee etc.
9. There
is a provision to generate various Reports, issue of SCN, letters and other
correspondence on line but till date ACES system cannot generate any correct
reports required by the Department in respect of revenue, assessee and service
category etc; and all the field officers have to prepare such reports manually
which consume lot of time; and now many assessee are not given any hard copy of
returns, yet officers are forced to do that, and when they ask assessee even
they also get annoyed and ask for provisions to file hard copy.
10. CAAP
Audit introduced but audit module is not yet operated on ACES, no access to
audit officers to see the return and registration and other details of assessee
on line and they still ask for the hard copy to Range and Divisions, this cause
hardship and delay in conducting audit also. No efforts till date to prepare
profile of assessee on line and have all the returns available and accessible
to other officers for review purpose like audit preventive or by Anti evasion
wings.
11. In
registration till now digital signature facility is not introduced and hence
assessee insists for signature and many a time even audit teams demands signed
copy when they visit for audit.
12. IN SCN module (SDR/DSR) for uploading of file
is so complicated that it takes time to load and also to open, hence senior
officers discourage to operate it, apart from the fact that due to this they
have to do adjudication on their own and on line and cannot keep or transfer
the case in call book on flimsy grounds to reduce their pendency on line. In
SDR/DSR module, there is no provision for bunching of similar cases (periodical
SCNs) of an assessee for issuance of consolidated one order-in-original
13. In
the Refund Modules, there is no provision for bunching similar refund / rebate
claims of one and same assessee. Hence, the AC/DC does not like to work on the
Refund Module
14. In
other misc matters also system is not proper for e.g. Cancellation of invoices on line, intimation
and permissions, PV reports on line in case of LTU, surrendering and
cancellation of registrations etc.
15. LAN
and Monitor has been installed by HP for Inspectors and other higher officers but
SSO ID and any work portfolio has not
been assigned to the inspectors till date;
Infrastructure related issues:
Suggestions for
improving Norms
16. The
LAN, Monitors and Printers has been installed in C.EX / Service Tax but 98%
Printers are presently not in working conditions because the cartages cost is
approx. Rs. 8,000/- which exhaust in a month only; The 60 % LAN & Monitor
installed for Inspector and other officers are lying unused in worst conditions
as not usable and only 40 % are working conditions but not proper and HP is claiming
huge maintenance charges for that without proper working ;
17. It is suggested that ACES system module should
be designed such like other department such as VAT, Income Tax etc; The present
programmer i.e. Wipro should be discarded and separate Department IT officers
has to be appointed ;
18. LAN
is not properly working so Login of ACES system by the officers should be
allowed through normal computer system as to enable the officers to work smoothly
from any where ;
19. Work
portfolio to the all officers from Inspector to Joint Commissioner is to be
allotted and same should be monitor by their higher ups ;
If department wants to
continue with the present system of ACES, then it should be upgraded and
operational in all respect. The problem faced by officers/trade should be
redressed within 24 hours. All the head of the office should sensitize the
issue and regularly monitor the progress made in the ACES for its smooth
functioning.
Here,in Tirunelveli Commissionerate, an AC/DC is having charge of two or more divisions and they have to clear at ;east 1000 returns in a month, i.e., about 50 returns per day. Earliest time of 5 minutes allotted per return, is it practically possible to spare 4 hours every day for scrutiny alone?
ReplyDelete